Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with a general score of 91.8 against 77.9. Galaxy A71 5G's body is much newer and way thinner, but also a bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater display density. The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Galaxy A71 5G features much more storage to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and faster video frame rate.
Galaxy A71 5G has just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.