Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with an 84.9 score against 77.9. The Samsung Galaxy A80 construction is much newer and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it's somewhat heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo features a lot better screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher display density.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A80, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and 4 less cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has higher video frame rate and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.