Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a score of 90.5 against 77.9. The Galaxy A90 5G is a incredibly newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's also heavier. The Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, and Motorola DROID Turbo comes with Android 4.4.4 operating system.
Galaxy A90 5G features a little bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F2 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a camera in the back with way more MP and faster 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.