Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having a score of 81 against 77.9. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Galaxy C9 Pro is a way newer and noticeably thinner phone than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it's a little bit heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less cpu cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola DROID Turbo features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater screen pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy C9 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.