Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-09-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a score of 83.3 against 77.9. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy M30s has the previous 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Galaxy M30s's design is newer and notably thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it is also just a little heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better looking screen than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy M30s has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M30s also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M30s, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Galaxy M30s counts with a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M30s also has better video frame rates and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Galaxy M30s features a superior battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 54% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.