Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-01-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 565 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is a little bit better than the Galaxy On7 Prime, having a general score of 77.9 against 76.9. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Motorola DROID Turbo design is way older, just a little heavier and a lot thicker than the Galaxy On7 Prime. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version while Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola DROID Turbo takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a much better resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.