Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a overall score of 77.9 against 77.8. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, so it offers some extra features. The Motorola DROID Turbo construction is somewhat lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is noticeably thicker and was released many years before.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and 13 GB less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a way lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a way higher resolution camera, a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a way better video definition. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 46% more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.