Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. Vivo X60 Pro is a notably newer and a lot thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's also just a little bit heavier. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS, but the vivo X60 Pro has an older 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro features a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a back camera with much more megapixels and higher video frame rates.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.