Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-10-28 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 5s, having a 77.9 score against 76.4. The Motorola DROID Turbo body is older, somewhat heavier and a lot thicker than Xiaomi Mi 5s. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo has older 4.4.4 version while Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a higher pixel number per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F2 aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Motorola DROID Turbo features better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.