Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 85.5 score against 77.9. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is just a little heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's notably thinner and noticeably newer. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher pixel density. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 256 GB and more internal memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a camera in the back with way less MP resolution and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.