Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.3 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.2.2 | Android 4.0 |
| 2013-07-23 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.41 x 2.80 x 0.28 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.83 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Kevlar | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Motorola X8 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1700 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| 400 MHz, quad-core GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.81 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7.2 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2130mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 312 hours standby time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.08 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is slightly better than Motorola DROID Ultra, getting a global score of 71.5 against 65.3. The Galaxy S III Cricket design is just a little lighter but thicker than Motorola DROID Ultra. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S III Cricket has 4.0 version while Motorola DROID Ultra has Android 4.4.4 version.
Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola DROID Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a quite greater pixels density. Galaxy S III Cricket has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Ultra, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 64 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Ultra, and although they both have a Dual-Core processing unit and 2 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also has an extra GPU. Motorola DROID Ultra features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 2130mAh battery size.
Galaxy S III Cricket shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Ultra, although it has a worse 1920x1080 video resolution and a lower resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.