Global Score | |
54.9 | 71.5 |
Basic Information | |
Motorola | Samsung |
Android 2.3, 2.2 | Android 4.0 |
2011-05-18 | 0000-00-00 |
5.02 x 2.58 x 0.39 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
5.47 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
-- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
-- | Plastic |
Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
$ 99.00 | $ 100.00 |
Display / Screen | |
4.3 inches | 4.8 inches |
540 x 960 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
-- | Super AMOLED |
256 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
7.8 | 8.2 |
Performance | |
NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
512 MB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
7.56 | 8.46 |
Storage | |
8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
4.62 | 7.56 |
Camera | |
8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
-- | f/2.60 aperture |
-- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
6.71 | 8.47 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
-- | Micro SIM |
3.2 | 5.6 |
Battery Life | |
1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
-- | Wireless Charging |
220 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
3.36 | 4 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
GPS | GPS |
-- | NFC |
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
FM Radio | -- |
The Galaxy S III Cricket is much better than Motorola Droid X2, getting a score of 71.5 against 54.9. The Galaxy S III Cricket is a thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Motorola Droid X2. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S III Cricket has newer 4.0 version and Motorola Droid X2 has Android 2.3.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a better CPU than Motorola Droid X2, and although they both have a Dual-Core CPU, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has a graphics processor and a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Droid X2, because it has a higher 1280 x 720 resolution, a just a little higher pixels density and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy S III Cricket takes greater pictures and videos than Motorola Droid X2, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has a much better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution. Galaxy S III Cricket has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid X2, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 64 GB.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Droid X2, because it has a 2100mAh battery capacity against 1540mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket costs a bit more money than the Motorola Droid X2, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.