Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a 92.8 score against 80.1. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's design is newer, extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an older 12 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back camera with a lot better 108 MP resolution and a lot better video resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery life is just as good as the Motorola Edge 20 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.