Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is a bit better than Motorola Edge (2022), having a global score of 90.8 against 84.7. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12. Even being the best we are comparing here, it must be noted that it's also an older, heavier and just a bit thicker phone.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 FE features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge (2022). Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge (2022) features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a camera in the back with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a bit more expensive than Motorola Edge (2022), but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.