Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a 90.8 score against 80.9. Galaxy Note 20 is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but both of them are 0.33inches thick. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher number of cores (and also faster).
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20. Both of them have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the same quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a screen with the same size. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features as much storage capacity to install games and applications as the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra one, both of them have the same internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with faster video frame rates, a lot higher 200 MP resolution back camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.