Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a global score of 80.9 against 76.6. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit lighter and a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a battery duration that is just as good as Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's battery performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a 0 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.