Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with an 82.5 score against 77. The Google Pixel 2 XL is a just a little bit heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Google Pixel 2 XL and Motorola Edge 40 Neo both have quite similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 42 percent more battery size. Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same size camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.