Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-09-14 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's general score of 77. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. The LG V30S ThinQ design is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little bit better looking display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a way better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.