Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's global score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 construction has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but it's a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 4 less CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a bit better screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit lower pixels count per display inch and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit bigger display. The Galaxy Note7 features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera and a way bigger camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.