Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having an 81.1 score against 77. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is incredibly older, somewhat thicker and heavier than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and images and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo feature similar batteries duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 0% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.