Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, having a score of 81.9 against 77. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a extremely newer phone than HTC U Ultra, but it's just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much more vibrant display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger display.
HTC U Ultra has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less cores (although they are faster). Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures and videos and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The HTC U Ultra has a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.