Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 474 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the HTC U11 EYEs's score of 76.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also a little thinner and just a little lighter than the HTC U11 EYEs. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo comes with Android 14 OS, and HTC U11 EYEs works with Android, HTC Sense UI OS.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better looking screen than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a just a little greater display pixels density, a little bit bigger display and a better 1256 x 2760 resolution. HTC U11 EYEs counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The HTC U11 EYEs counts with more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has just a little better battery lifetime than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 10 percent greater battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way higher 50 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.