Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's general score of 87.1. Apple iPhone X's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little bit better display than iPhone X, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a lot brighter display and a bigger display.
IPhone X features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior storage for apps and games than iPhone X, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture to capture better photography in low light environments, a lot more megapixels back camera and a way larger sensor capturing much better quality photos and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.