Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than Apple iPhone XR, having an 87.1 score against 82. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot newer than Apple iPhone XR, it is a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. IPhone XR counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has 9 GB less RAM memory and less cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than iPhone XR, because it has a little greater pixels number per display inch, a higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit larger display and way more display brightness. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture, a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.