Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black glare |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than Asus ROG Phone 3, with an 87.1 score against 86.3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is notably newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than Asus ROG Phone 3. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a slightly better screen than Asus ROG Phone 3, because it has a little bit higher pixels density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a way brighter display.
Asus ROG Phone 3 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. They have 8 CPU cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Asus ROG Phone 3, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light environments and a lot tinier sensor which provides a much worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.