Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 2, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 81.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is way newer, but notably heavier and a bit thicker than the Google Pixel 2. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a quite lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a way bigger display.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much more MP back camera, a bigger aperture, a lot bigger camera sensor and faster video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.