Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3, getting a global score of 87.1 against 80. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is incredibly newer, but extremely heavier and just a bit thicker than Google Pixel 3. Google Pixel 3 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images, a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.