Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with a score of 87.1 against 80.7. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly newer than the Google Pixel 3 XL, it's just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture for better low light photos, a back camera with a way better 50 MP resolution, better video frame rate and a way bigger sensor taking way better quality photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has improved battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.