Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Google Pixel 3a, having an 87.1 score against 78.8. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11, giving you a couple additional features. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly newer than the Google Pixel 3a, it is incredibly heavier and a bit thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a quite lower pixels quantity per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen. Google Pixel 3a features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way bigger sensor, better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.