Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a score of 87.1 against 78.9. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11, providing some extra features and enhanced performance. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer phone than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much more mega pixels back camera, higher 60 fps video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 22 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.