Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Just black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer cellphone than Google Pixel 4a, although it's heavier and a little bit thicker. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11, so it gives some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Google Pixel 4a has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a much more mega pixels camera and higher video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.