Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, with a overall score of 87.5 against 87.1. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. These phones use Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a sharper display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.