Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a overall score of 89 against 87.1. Although Google Pixel 5 is way older than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and a lot lighter. The Google Pixel 5 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better camera than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality, a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low light environments and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.