Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the HTC One M9, although it's also extremely heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than HTC One M9, because although it has a quite worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a much larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
HTC One M9 features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an extra graphics processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster 60 fps video frame rate, a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with much more MP and a way larger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.