Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the HTC U Ultra, having an 87.1 score against 77. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is way newer than the HTC U Ultra's, but it's just a bit thicker and heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit lower amount of pixels per display inch and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger display.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much more megapixels camera, a way larger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos, better video frame rate and a larger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.