Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the HTC U11, getting an 87.1 score against 77.6. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is noticeably newer than the HTC U11, it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. HTC U11 has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter display than HTC U11, because although it has a lot less pixels per inch of display and a little lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.