Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than HTC U11 EYEs's global score of 76.9. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is incredibly newer, but just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than HTC U11 EYEs. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with Android 14 operating system, while HTC U11 EYEs works with Android, HTC Sense UI operating system.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
HTC U11 EYEs has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit superior battery duration than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.