Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Huawei |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-01-10 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 775.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Huawei Mate 9 Pro's 78.7 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Huawei Mate 9 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a extremely newer device than the Huawei Mate 9 Pro, but it's heavier and thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because although it has a way worse count of pixels in each inch of screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a larger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little better battery lifetime than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a way larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs, better video frame rates and a way bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.