Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the LG G7 Fit, having a global score of 87.1 against 77. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is way newer than LG G7 Fit's, but it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
LG G7 Fit has a bit better display than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has much worse brightness and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG G7 Fit counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM and lesser CPU cores (although they are faster).
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a greater camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera with a much better 50 MP resolution, a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality, better 60 fps video frame rates and a lot larger aperture for better captures in low light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.