Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the LG G7 ThinQ, getting a general score of 87.1 against 81. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is newer than LG G7 ThinQ, it's heavier and just a bit thicker. These phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller screen and much less brightness, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater pixels density. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.