Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Aurora black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 general score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is notably newer than the LG G8X ThinQ's, but it's a little thicker and a bit heavier.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a slightly better storage for games and applications than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much larger sensor taking way higher quality photos, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.