Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Titan gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than the LG K92, getting an 87.1 score against 85.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is much newer and just a little bit lighter than LG K92's, although it is also a bit thicker. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version, offering lots of additional features.
The LG K92 has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better display than LG K92. Both of them have the same number of pixels in each inch of display, an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a same size screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG K92, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor and a larger camera aperture. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.