Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Mirror black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than LG Q70, with a general score of 87.1 against 77.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is noticeably newer and a little bit lighter, but just a little thicker than the LG Q70. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, counting with lots of additional features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than LG Q70, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than LG Q70, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The LG Q70 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than LG Q70, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, a back facing camera with much more megapixels, faster video frame rate and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit superior battery life than LG Q70, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.