Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Holographic white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the LG Stylo 6's 76.7 general score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a somewhat lighter device than the LG Stylo 6, but both of them are equally thin.
The LG Stylo 6 has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better looking display than LG Stylo 6, although it has a quite smaller display, a quite worse pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a little better battery lifetime than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.