Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is extremely newer than the LG V30S ThinQ's, but it's heavier and thicker. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a much lower quantity of pixels in each screen inch and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with greater battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36% larger battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.6 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much bigger sensor and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.