Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little bit better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse pixel density and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster video frame rate, a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with improved battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.