Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's global score of 81.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer phone than LG V40 ThinQ, although it is heavier and thicker. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it gives lots of additional features.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a lot lower pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage to install applications and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes greater photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a much larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.