Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a global score of 87.1 against 87.1. LG Velvet is an incredibly older phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but LG could make it a little lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. The LG Velvet has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter display than LG Velvet, although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a bit better photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs, better video frame rates and a larger camera aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than LG Velvet, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a little better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.