Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 overall score. Even being the best we compare here, LG Wing is a much older, notably thicker and a lot heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG Wing has 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14.
LG Wing features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter screen than LG Wing, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a just a little inferior number of pixels per display inch and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The LG Wing and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra feature quite similar cameras, because although the LG Wing has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and/or video in low light environments and a lot tinier back camera sensor which provides a lot lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, it also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
LG Wing features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has just 256 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better battery performance than LG Wing, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.