Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-09-10 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Glacier |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Microsoft Surface Duo, with an 87.1 score against 78.8. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer and noticeably lighter cellphone than the Microsoft Surface Duo, but it's also much thicker. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Microsoft Surface Duo has Android 10 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Microsoft Surface Duo, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit smaller display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
Microsoft Surface Duo features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with greater battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3577mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.